Through coverage of the market, research and up-to-date analysis, Games and Learning reports on the opportunities and challenges facing those seeking to unlock the educational power of games. more »
Monster Music is one of the games developed by the Center for Children and Technology to teach concepts connected to electricity.
How should developers looking to create science games pick the topics they choose to address? What topics might be a good fit to the game genres and mechanics developers have access to, or can dream up to entertain and engage a learner?
There are many ways to answer this question, of course. We approach it from a developmental and educational perspective. Here are some things that drove our process and that we have seen in others’ work as well.
Specific ages, not just “kids.”
Kids are different at different ages. Their attention span, the amount of cognitive load they can bear, the prior knowledge they bring to the game, their tolerance for fantasy and whimsy, and their beliefs about what makes for a fun, fair, or worthwhile game all change dramatically across different age groups. A game that really addresses the learning needs of one age group is unlikely to work equally well for another age group.
It’s what you do, not what you see.
While a beautiful game is a lovely thing, the joy of gaming is in what you do – and they key to learning is also in what we are able to do. The opportunity to help kids build new ideas and explore new relationships is in the nature of the doing that’s available to them within a game.
Think of the recent overwhelming popularity of Minecraft with young people – its transparent, rich, mechanics allow kids to do an enormous amount – the sketchy, low-fi graphics are not a concern. Without getting into more complicated discussions about representation in video games, it’s important to stress that no matter what we show in a game, there is no guarantee that it will be seen or attended to by the player. And even if it is, the chances that the player will interpret that visual in the way that the designers intended are slim. Mechanics are critical – visuals are not.
What is it that they don’t yet know?
This is the piece that is hardest for developers to gain access to unless they partner with educators. Learning – that is, building complex ideas that go beyond memorization of statements or procedures – is not a matter of being informed of something you don’t yet understand. If that were the case, I would happily learn what my microbiologist father-in-law does by reading some of his journal articles.
Rather, moving from not knowing to knowing requires gaining access to a series of insights – a type of relationship, a new pattern, a new possibility in the world – that was not previously available to you. A truly good educational game gives kids the change to encounter and engage directly with some new insight.
The greatest leap of imagination that educators need to make every day is to try to understand what it feels like to not know something. What does a page of text look like to an eight year old who can’t read? What does a molecular model of a process of chemical change look like to a kid who doesn’t have the slightest idea what a molecule really is?
A good teacher knows which properties of those mysterious systems a child needs to discover in order to begin to understand them. Games, paired with collaboration, guidance and teaching from peers and adults, can give us great opportunities to help kids acquire these kinds of insights.
Editor’s Note: You can learn more about the Possible Worlds project and find the games and teaching materials at http://possibleworlds.edc.org/.
Possible Worlds Creator: Developers Should Focus on Function Over Aesthetics
By Katherine McMillan Culp - May 12, 2014
Monster Music is one of the games developed by the Center for Children and Technology to teach concepts connected to electricity.
How should developers looking to create science games pick the topics they choose to address? What topics might be a good fit to the game genres and mechanics developers have access to, or can dream up to entertain and engage a learner?
There are many ways to answer this question, of course. We approach it from a developmental and educational perspective. Here are some things that drove our process and that we have seen in others’ work as well.
Specific ages, not just “kids.”
Kids are different at different ages. Their attention span, the amount of cognitive load they can bear, the prior knowledge they bring to the game, their tolerance for fantasy and whimsy, and their beliefs about what makes for a fun, fair, or worthwhile game all change dramatically across different age groups. A game that really addresses the learning needs of one age group is unlikely to work equally well for another age group.
It’s what you do, not what you see.
While a beautiful game is a lovely thing, the joy of gaming is in what you do – and they key to learning is also in what we are able to do. The opportunity to help kids build new ideas and explore new relationships is in the nature of the doing that’s available to them within a game.
Think of the recent overwhelming popularity of Minecraft with young people – its transparent, rich, mechanics allow kids to do an enormous amount – the sketchy, low-fi graphics are not a concern. Without getting into more complicated discussions about representation in video games, it’s important to stress that no matter what we show in a game, there is no guarantee that it will be seen or attended to by the player. And even if it is, the chances that the player will interpret that visual in the way that the designers intended are slim. Mechanics are critical – visuals are not.
What is it that they don’t yet know?
This is the piece that is hardest for developers to gain access to unless they partner with educators. Learning – that is, building complex ideas that go beyond memorization of statements or procedures – is not a matter of being informed of something you don’t yet understand. If that were the case, I would happily learn what my microbiologist father-in-law does by reading some of his journal articles.
Rather, moving from not knowing to knowing requires gaining access to a series of insights – a type of relationship, a new pattern, a new possibility in the world – that was not previously available to you. A truly good educational game gives kids the change to encounter and engage directly with some new insight.
The greatest leap of imagination that educators need to make every day is to try to understand what it feels like to not know something. What does a page of text look like to an eight year old who can’t read? What does a molecular model of a process of chemical change look like to a kid who doesn’t have the slightest idea what a molecule really is?
A good teacher knows which properties of those mysterious systems a child needs to discover in order to begin to understand them. Games, paired with collaboration, guidance and teaching from peers and adults, can give us great opportunities to help kids acquire these kinds of insights.
Editor’s Note: You can learn more about the Possible Worlds project and find the games and teaching materials at http://possibleworlds.edc.org/.
News Feed
Monkey brains and video games: Pittsburgh researchers learn how to learn
Learning a new skill can be tricky, and neuroscientists aren't entirely sure how humans do it. Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University are using video games, brain implants and Rhesus monkeys in an effort to figure it out
Via WITF. June 12, 2019
It’s Game Over for the Institute of Play. But Its Legacy Lives On.
“When we heard the news, it was definitely sad... The idea of how education could be transformed through play and games was inspired by the research the institute was doing on games and learning, and which inspired us as social entrepreneurs and practitioners.”
Via Edsurge. June 10, 2019
STEM School Center Combines Air Force Training, Gaming
According to the Air Force Research Lab, the goal of the Learning Laboratory is to "serve as a national authority on the integration and application of game-based technology to address USAF education and training needs. In addition to leveraging off-the-shelf technology to benefit Warfighter training, our goal is to inspire student interest in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), specifically modeling and simulation, and to equip the next generation defense workforce."
Via Military.com. June 10, 2019
Tweets
Follow @games_learning